|
|
|
Increasing incidence of hypodermosis in Kangra valley of Himachal Pradesh Katoch R.1, Singh M.M.2, Agnihotri R.K.1, Mitra S.3 1Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur-176 062, India 2Department of Veterinary Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur-176 062, India 3Department of Veterinary Public Health, Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur-176 062, India Abstract Examination of cattle during December 2001 and January 2003 from Changar area of Kangra Valley, Himachal Pradesh, showed presence of warbles from neck to flank region. Mature larvae collected from nodules were identified as Hypoderma lineatum. Regular visits during clinical camps to this area and discussion with farmers suggest that there is an increasing trend of hypodermosis in cattle which is lowering their milk production and weight gain. Top Keywords Himachal Pradesh, Warble, Hypoderma lineatum, Larva, Cattle. Top | Introduction Hide depreciation is the most important manifestation of Hypoderma infection. It also results in reduced weight gain and milk yield. They are a common parasite of cattle in northern hemisphere (Soulsby, 1982). The fly occurs in summer with a short life span. It lays eggs on hairs of legs of the host. Larva wanders in subcutaneous tissue and reaches the back of animal via submucosal connective tissue of oesophageal wall or through spinal canal and epidural fat (Soulsby, 1982). In the present study, 121 cattle of Changar area of Kangra Valley were examined for nodules of hypodermosis. |
Top Materials and Methods In the December month of 2001, 20 animals were examined at two different places of Changar area and history of production in lactating animals as well body weight were recorded. Similarly, in January month of 2003, 101 animals were examined at 8 different places of Changar area. Nodule examination on animals was made from neck to flank region. In positive Hypoderma infection cases, the number of nodules were counted as well as mature larvae were collected and identified. |
Top Results and Discussion In the year 2001, two animals showed nodules of Hypoderma extending from neck region to flank region (Table 1). The mature larvae were collected and identified as Hypoderma lineatum (Fig. 1). However, in January, 2003, examination of 101 cattle at 8 different locations in the same area revealed presence of four cases of Hypoderma infection. The larva was identified as H. lineatum. History recorded from farmers revealed that animal suffering with this infection had marked decline in milk production (50-75%) as well as in weight gain. Andrews (1978) estimated loss of milk production due to hypodermosis at 50% in Canada and at 10-15% in Europe. Sharma et al. (1999) recorded first case of hypodermosis from Deogram. Sen and Fletcher (1962) also mentioned presence of H. lineatum and H. bovis from cattle of Punjab and North-West. Recently, Islam et al. (2003) also recorded Hypoderma diana in hog deers from North-East Himalayan region. Regular visits during clinical camps to this area and discussion with farmers suggest that there is an increasing trend of Hypoderma incidence in cattle. The present study suggests that Hypoderma fly may be prevalent from March to July, as warble stage is seen from December to February. Suitable methods of control should be adopted to check this infection as it has also zoonotic potential (Sen and Fletcher, 1962). The fly may lay eggs on horse and man if cattle is not available and may result in aberrant migration of larvae with serious results, although larva do not mature in these hosts (Soulsby, 1982). Since equines form the back bone of transportation in Himachal Pradesh to carry loads and also share common pasture with cattle, they are equally prone to this infection, if control measures are not adopted at the earliest.
|
Top Figure Fig. 1: Mature larvae of Hypoderma lineatum
| | |
|
Table Table 1: Results of Hypoderma examination in cattle
| Month | Year | No. of cattle examined | Positive percentage | Average No. of modules/larvae collected |
| December | 2001 | 4 | 25.00 | 49 | December | 2001 | 16 | 6.25 | 32 | | 20 | 10.00 | January | 2003 | 19 | – | – | January | 2003 | 07 | – | – | January | 2003 | 06 | – | – | January | 2003 | 21 | – | – | January | 2003 | 12 | – | – | January | 2003 | 17 | – | – | January | 2003 | 05 | – | – | January | 2003 | 14 | 28.50 | 39.5 | | 101 | 3.90 |
| |
| References | | AndrewsA.H.1978.
Warble fly: The life cycle, distribution, economic losses and control.
Vet. Rec.,
103:
348–353. TopBack | | IslamS., ChandraP., KalitaM.2003.
Observation on cutaneous myiasis due to Hypoderma (Brauer, 1858) in hog deers.
J. Vet. Parasitol.,
17:
105–108. TopBack | | SoulsbyE.J.L.1982.
Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals.
7th Edn.
ELBS,
Baillere & Tindal, London. TopBack | | SenS.K., ChandraP., FletcherT.B.1962.
Veterinary Entomology and Acarology in India.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, pp.
1–668. TopBack | | SharmaS.K., KatochR., SharmaA.1999.
Hypoderma infestation in a cow: A case report.
Indian Vet. J.,
76:
1105. TopBack |
| |
|
|
|