Section I 1. Introduction Economic lot size for batch production can help an organisation to cut its inventory to the barest minimum level. The decrease in setup cost reduces inventory and increases service level. Also, irrespective of original setup cost and quantum of its reduction the decrease in setup cost results in marginally increasing returns. When setup cost is reduced to very low levels, i.e. when it approaches zero, reduction ininventory level and total variable cost is very large. Also, slopes of working stock curve, safety stock curve and total cost curve increase dramatically near the zero setup cost. Essential theoretical framework for this is developed in Section II of the paper. Section III demonstrates this with the help of a numerical illustration. Results of this illustration are contained in Tables 1, 2A, 2b and 3.
Top Section II 2. Theoretical Framework Inventory in a batch-manufacturing situation can be divided into two parts. One part depends upon the batch produced and is called working stock. Second part is maintained to take care of fluctuations in demand during the supply lead time and is known as safety stock. The safety stock depends upon the lead time, variability in the lead time and variability of the daily demand during lead time, and desired service level. The lead time in batch manufacturing consists of time spent in initiating the production of the batch, processing time of the batch and time required to make available the output for consumption. If assumption is made that the batch can only be used after it is completely processed (instantaneous replenishment) and that other assumptions of Harris Formula also hold, then average inventory, I, is given by:
2.1 Effect of Reduction in Setup Cost on Batch Size and Variable Cost Let us define the following:
Q | = | economic lot size in units |
D | = | annual expected demand in units |
h | = | holding cost per unit per year |
C | = | annual total variable cost |
Cs | = | annual variable cost or holding cost of safety stock component of inventory |
Cq | = | annual variable cost of working stock component of inventory |
I | = | average inventory in units |
Iq | = | average working stock in units = Q/2 |
Then
 | ( 1 ) |
Reduction in average working stock Iq - Iq' is
 | ( 2 ) |
By differentiating Iq (equation 1) with respect to K we get the slope of the average working stock curve.
 | ( 3 ) |
similarly
 | ( 4 ) |
From equations 3 and 4 it follows that slope of average working stock curve and annual total variable cost curve is proportional to (I/K)½. This means as K decreases, slope of the average working stock curve increases and as K approaches zero increase in the slope of the curve is rather steep. This shows that the continuous reduction in setup cost results in higher marginal reduction in average working stock. Also, the reduction in average working stock becomes markedly high when setup cost is near zero value. The variable cost component Cq also varies in the similar manner with respect to the changes in setup cost. 2.2 Effect of Reduction in Setup Cost on Safety Stock The safety stock depends upon the variability of demand during the lead time and service level. Reduction in setup cost reduces the lot size thereby reducing the processing time of the batch. If we assume that the setup cost is proportional to setup time, the reduction in setup cost reduces setup time also. This results in reduction of the variability of demand during the lead time and consequently safety stock requirment for a given service level. Let us define the following:
L | = | total lead time in days |
ts | = | time required to setup the batch in days |
tq | = | time necessary to process the batch |
ti | = | time required to make available the output of the batch for use |
ts' | = | reduced setup time in days |
tq' | = | time required to process smaller batch when setup cost is K' |
L' | = | reduced lead time due to reduction in setup cost |
σd | = | standard deviation of daily demand |
Rp | = | rate of production in units per day |
Is' | = | safety stock when lead time is L' |
Then
 | ( 5 ) |
 | ( 6 ) |
As
 | ( 7 ) |
Also
Where Z is number of standard deviations for a certain service level. Then reduction in safety stock is Is - Is'
 | ( 8 ) |
(Figure 1 is a typical curve showing variation in safety stock with respect to K based on the data of numerical illustration of Section III.)
Also
 | ( 9 ) |
Differentiating Is with respect to K, we get slope of the safety stock curve.
 | ( 10 ) |
2.3 Effect of reduction in setup cost on total variable cost C  | ( 11 ) |
By substituting the values of D, h, σd, Z, ts, Rp, ti and K (numerical illustration of section III) in equations 3, 10, and 11, we obtain the values of slopes of working stock curve, safety stock curve and total variable cost curve. Table 1 contains the values of slopes of these curves for various values of K between 0.1 to 1000. Typical curves representing the slopes of safety stock curve, working stock curve and total variable stock curve are shown in Figure 1. From these curves it is clear that when setup cost decreases slope of these curves go on increasing. Also there is a large increase in the slope when K approaches zero. 2.4 Effect of Reduction in Setup Cost on Service Level Reduction in setup cost reduces lot size and therefore, for a given annual demand D, increases the number of lots produced in a year. As number of lots increases, safety stock is required as many more number of times in a year. This aparently would seem to reduce average service level over the year. However in practice, reduction in K and increase in number of lots achieves normally higher service level. Let us define the following:
SLA | = | average service level for the year |
SL | = | service level during lead time corresponding to a certain Z value |
N | = | number of lots per year |
WD | = | number of working days per year |
Then
Top Section III Numerical Illustrations Let
D | = | 1,000,000 units per year |
h | = | $ 0.20 per unit per year |
P | = | $ 1 per unit (as unit cost is $ 1, inventory in units is same as in dollars) |
d | = | 4,000 units per day (assuming 250 working days per year) |
Z | = | 4 (assuming 99.997% service level) |
Then
| Lead time L | = | ts + tp + ti | | = | 10 + 10 + 0.1 | | = | 20.1 days | Safety Stock Is | = |  | | = |  | | = | 17,933 units | Average | Inventory I | = | 50,000 + 17,933 | | = | 67,933 units | Total Variable | Cost C | = |  | | = | 20,000 + 0.2x17,933 | | = | $23,587 |
|
|
Average Service Level
Let setup cost be decreased to $ 900 from $ 1,000
| K' | = | $900 | Q' | = |  | N' | = | number of lots per year when K = $ 900 | | = |  | Iq' | = | 47,434 units | Decrease in working stock Iq- Iq' is | | = | 50,000 - 47,434 | | = | 2,566 units | tp' | = | 94,868/10,000 | | = | 9.4846 days | ts' | = | K'/K | | = |  | | = | 9 days | L' | = | 9 + 9.4868 + 0.1 | | = | 18.5868 days | Is' | = |  | | = |  | | = | 17,245 units | Decrease in safety stock is Is- Is' | = | 17,933 - 17,245 = 688 units safety stock | C | = |  | | = | 18973.7 + 3449 | | = | $ 22,423 | Reduction in total variable cost is C-C' | | = | 23,587 - 22,423 | | = | $1164 | Average service level when K is $ 900 | | = |  | | = | 99.997649% |
|
|
In this manner incremental reduction in working stock, safety stock and total variable cost as well as change in average service level can be calculated by varying values of K. By keeping increments in K same, incremental variations in Iq, Is and C can be analysed. Tables 2A & 2B contain values of Iq, Is, C and incremental variation in Iq, Is and C for different values of K. Figure 2 graphically shows variation in Iq, Is and C with respect to K. Table 3 contains average service level and probability of shortage for different values of K.
4.1 Limitations In the present work it has been assumed that setup cost and setup time are directly related. No research studies were found to substantiate or contradict this assumption. As setup cost mainly depends upon the setup time of the equipment and related manpower, this assumption is logical and is therefore made. 4.2 Conclusion Reduction in setup cost is essential in reducing inventories, and total variable cost associated with inventories including that of the safety stocks. Each successive reduction in setup cost provides higher and higher returns. In the vicinity of zero setup cost, reduction in inventory and total variable costs are very large. In the typical case of Section III, when setup cost decreases from $ 1,000 to $ 10, average service level goes on increasing from 99.997588% to 99.998560% (Table 3). Further reduction in K decreases service level from 99.998560% to 99.997588% (at K = $ 0.1). However, when ti is zero, then SLA is 99.997600% when K is $ 1000, and as K decreases from $ 1000 to $ 0.1, SLA goes on increasing. When K is $ 0.1 average service level is 99.998788%. Also probability of shortage becomes almost half from 0.0024% to 0.0012%. From this, conclusion can be drawn that reduction in setup cost has favourable effect on average service level. However when ti is 0.1 day, average service level starts decreasing after reaching a maximum value of 99.998560% at K = $ 10. This is because when K becomes very small, value of ti becomes a substantial component of lead time. At this stage in order to improve average service level reduction in setup time and batch processing time is not enough. The time required to make available the batch for consumption should also be reduced. 4.3 End Notes In the paper standard expressions for economic lot size, working stock, average inventory, lead time, safety stock and service level are used and these are available in standard texts. Top Figures Figure 1:
|  | |
| Figure 2:
|  | |
|
Tables Table 1:
| Setup Cost K$ | Slope of Working Stock Curve | Slope of Safety Stock Curve | Slope of Total Variable Cost Curve |
| 1000 | 25.00 | 6.69 | 11.34 | 950 | 25.65 | 6.88 | 11.64 | 900 | 26.35 | 7.08 | 11.96 | 850 | 27.12 | 7.31 | 12.31 | 800 | 27.95 | 7.55 | 12.69 | 750 | 28.87 | 7.82 | 13.11 | 700 | 29.88 | 8.12 | 13.58 | 650 | 31.01 | 8.46 | 14.10 | 600 | 32.27 | 8.84 | 14.68 | 550 | 33.71 | 9.28 | 15.34 | 500 | 35.36 | 9.79 | 16.10 | 450 | 37.27 | 10.38 | 16.98 | 400 | 39.53 | 11.09 | 18.03 | 350 | 42.26 | 11.96 | 19.30 | 300 | 45.64 | 13.06 | 20.87 | 250 | 50.00 | 14.51 | 22.90 | 200 | 55.90 | 16.52 | 25.67 | 150 | 64.55 | 19.59 | 29.74 | 100 | 79.06 | 25.00 | 36.62 | 90 | 83.33 | 26.67 | 38.67 | 80 | 88.39 | 28.67 | 41.09 | 70 | 94.49 | 31.14 | 44.02 | 60 | 102.06 | 34.27 | 47.68 | 50 | 111.80 | 38.43 | 52.41 | 40 | 125.00 | 44.27 | 58.85 | 30 | 144.34 | 53.24 | 68.38 | 20 | 176.78 | 69.28 | 84.57 | 10 | 250.00 | 109.54 | 121.91 | 1 | 790.57 | 515.01 | 419.23 | 0.1 | 2500.00 | 2275.11 | 1455.02 |
| | Table 2A:
| Setup Cost K | Average Working Stock Q/2 | Safety Stock Is | Total Variable Cost C | Incremental Decrease In |
| Working Stock | Safety Stock | Total Variable cost |
| 1000 | 50000 | 17933 | 23587 | 900 | 47434 | 17245 | 22423 | 2566 | 688 | 1164 | 800 | 44721 | 16514 | 21191 | 2713 | 731 | 1231 | 700 | 41833 | 15731 | 19879 | 2888 | 783 | 1312 | 600 | 38730 | 14884 | 18469 | 3103 | 847 | 1411 | 500 | 35355 | 13955 | 16933 | 3374 | 929 | 1536 | 400 | 31623 | 12915 | 15232 | 3733 | 1040 | 1701 | 300 | 27386 | 11715 | 13297 | 4237 | 1200 | 1935 | 200 | 22361 | 10254 | 10995 | 5025 | 1460 | 2302 | 100 | 15811 | 8258 | 7976 | 6549 | 1996 | 3019 | 0.1 | 500 | 1793 | 559 | 15311 | 6465 | 7418 |
| | Table 2B:
| Setup Cost K | Average Working Stock Q/2 | Safety Stock Is | Total Variable Cost C | Incremental Decrease In |
| Working Stock | Safety Stock | Total Variable cost |
| 100 | 15811 | 8258 | 7976 | 90 | 15000 | 8000 | 7600 | 811 | 258 | 376 | 80 | 14142 | 7724 | 7202 | 858 | 276 | 398 | 70 | 13229 | 7425 | 6777 | 913 | 299 | 425 | 60 | 12247 | 7099 | 6319 | 981 | 326 | 458 | 50 | 11180 | 6736 | 5819 | 1067 | 362 | 499 | 40 | 10000 | 6325 | 5265 | 1180 | 412 | 554 | 30 | 8660 | 5841 | 4632 | 1340 | 484 | 633 | 20 | 7071 | 5237 | 3876 | 1589 | 603 | 756 | 10 | 5000 | 4382 | 2876 | 2071 | 855 | 999 | 0.1 | 500 | 1793 | 559 | 4500 | 2588 | 2318 |
| Note: All figures are in Dollars |
| | Table 3: Effect of Setup Cost on Average Service Level
| Setup Cost K($) | Lead Time L (days) | Average Service Level SLA(%) | Probability of Shortage 100-SLA(%) |
|
| when ti = 0.1 | when ti = 0 | when ti = 0.1 | when ti = 0 |
| 1000 | 20.1000 | 99.997588 | 99.997600 | 0.0024 | 0.0024 | 900 | 18.5868 | 99.997649 | 99.997662 | 0.0024 | 0.0023 | 800 | 17.0443 | 99.997713 | 99.997727 | 0.0023 | 0.0023 | 700 | 15.4666 | 99.997782 | 99.997796 | 0.0022 | 0.0022 | 600 | 13.8460 | 99.997855 | 99.997870 | 0.0021 | 0.0021 | 500 | 12.1711 | 99.997935 | 99.997951 | 0.0021 | 0.0020 | 400 | 10.4246 | 99.998022 | 99.998041 | 0.0020 | 0.0020 | 300 | 8.5772 | 99.998121 | 99.998143 | 0.0019 | 0.0019 | 200 | 6.5721 | 99.998237 | 99.998263 | 0.0018 | 0.0017 | 100 | 4.2623 | 99.998383 | 99.998421 | 0.0016 | 0.0016 | 90 | 4.0000 | 99.998400 | 99.998440 | 0.0016 | 0.0016 | 80 | 3.7284 | 99.998418 | 99.998461 | 0.0016 | 0.0015 | 70 | 3.4458 | 99.998437 | 99.998483 | 0.0016 | 0.0015 | 60 | 3.1495 | 99.998457 | 99.998506 | 0.0015 | 0.0015 | 50 | 2.8361 | 99.998478 | 99.998532 | 0.0015 | 0.0015 | 40 | 2.5000 | 99.998500 | 99.998560 | 0.0015 | 0.0014 | 30 | 2.1321 | 99.998523 | 99.998592 | 0.0015 | 0.0014 | 20 | 1.7142 | 99.998545 | 99.998630 | 0.0015 | 0.0014 | 10 | 1.2000 | 99.998560 | 99.998680 | 0.0014 | 0.0013 | 5 | 0.8571 | 99.998545 | 99.998715 | 0.0015 | 0.0013 | 1 | 0.4262 | 99.998383 | 99.998762 | 0.0016 | 0.0012 | 0.1 | 0.2010 | 99.997588 | 99.998788 | 0.0024 | 0.0012 |
| |
|