(18.97.14.83)
[ij] [ij] [ij] 
Email id
 

Baba Farid University Dental Journal
Year : 2024, Volume : 14, Issue : 1
First page : ( 87) Last page : ( 98)
Print ISSN : 0976-8181. Online ISSN : 2230-7273.
Article DOI : 10.5958/2230-7273.2024.00030.3

Comparative evaluation of implant supported fixed prosthesis – immediate vs delayed implant - A study of 20 implants

Solanki Manisha1, Laxmi Shakya Kumari2,*, Vaishnav Harish3, Nehe Shweta4, Mehra Vinod5, Kumar Kishan6

1Professor and Head of Department, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, India

2PG Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, India

3PG Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, India

4PG Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, India

5PG Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, India

6PG Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, India

*Corresponding Author: Shakya Kumari Laxmi, PG Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, India, Email: laxmishakya3110@gmail.com

Online Published on 23 July, 2024.

Abstract

Purpose

To compare and evaluate implant supported fixed prosthesis in immediate and delayed implant.

Materials and methods

20 patients with age between (25-70) years old were equally divided into two groups receiving immediate implant and delayed implant supported fixed prosthesis. Group (I): Patients with immediate implant fixed prosthesis. Group (II): Patients with delayed implant fixed prosthesis. Each case was evaluated clinically and radiographically on day 1, day 7, 3rd month and 6th month (at the time of fixed prosthesis).

Results

The results shows that the delayed implant supported fixed prosthesis is undoubtedly the best option for patient as compared to immediate implant supported fixed prosthesis as it shows less bone loss and also probing depth is not increases in such type of implant fixed prosthesis.

Conclusion

In Comparison to delayed implant fixed prosthesis there was higher incidence of implant failure and marginal bone loss in immediate implant supported fixed prosthesis.

Top

Keywords

Immediate implant fixed prosthesis, Delayed implant fixed prosthesis, Bone loss.

Top

  
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
834,929,602 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.