Users online: 2701    [ij] [ij] [ij] 
Example of HTML Menu
Email id

ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice
Year : 2008, Volume : 45, Issue : 3
First page : ( 206) Last page : ( 211)
Print ISSN : 0474-7615.

Evaluation of system of rice intensification in a high rainfall area of North- Western Himalayas

Sharma Pradeep K., Masand S.S.

Department of Soil Science, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062(HP), India


Field experiments were conducted during 2002–2004 to evaluate SRI in a high rainfall area of north-western Himalayas. Effects of age of seedlings (7-12-d old i.e. SRI vs 22-28-d old i.e. conventionally transplanted rice (CTR), plant-hill spacing (15x15 and 30x30 cm) and water regime (continuous, CF vs intermittent flooding, IF) on plant height, rice yield and yield parameters (tillers, grains panicle-1 and 1000-grain weight), and water use efficiency (WUE) in rice (cv. RP 2421) were investigated. Younger seedlings produced plants taller than older seedlings on average by 14.1 cm. Effective tillers hill-1 increased from 10 to 25 while effective tillers m-2 decreased significantly from 413 to 277 with the increase in plant-hill spacing. The 30x30 cm spacing produced higher grains panicle-1 (79) and 1000- grain weight (21.67 g) than the 15x15 cm spacing (70 grains panicle-1 and 20.42 g 1000-grain weight). Grain yield was statistically the same under all treatments (3.24- 4.05 t ha-1), except CTR-30 with significantly lowest grain yield of 2.84 t ha-1. Numerically, SRI-15(CF) and SRI-30(CF) produced 20 and 13%, respectively, higher grain yield than CTR-15(CF) i.e. the farmers' practice. Total water use was higher by 80–634 mm in SRI than CTR. The WUE under CTR and SRI varied with the water regime; under CF, it was significantly higher with CTR-15 (1.87 kg ha-1 mm-1) than SRI-15 (1.69 kg ha-1 mm-1), and under IF, it was significantly higher at 15x15 cm (1.64–1.75 kg ha-1 mm-1) than at 30x30 cm spacing (1.48- 1.51 kg ha-1 mm-1) under both SRI and CTR. SRI at 30x30 cm spacing required 222 man-days ha-1 compared to 833 man-days ha-1 with CTR-15; SRI required 19–11% more time for transplanting than CTR irrespective of hill-spacing. Compared with CTR-15, the SRI-30 showed advantage in terms of higher rice yield (13%), lower seed rate (1/10th of CTR) and lesser time and labour requirement during transplanting (1/4th of CTR).



Age of seedlings, conventionally transplanted rice, plant-hill spacing, system of rice intensification, water regime, water use efficiency.


║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
293,421,449 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.