(3.233.224.8)
Users online: 1185    [ij] [ij] [ij] 
Email id
 

Indian Journal of Contemporary Dentistry
Year : 2019, Volume : 7, Issue : 1
First page : ( 47) Last page : ( 51)
Print ISSN : 2320-5806. Online ISSN : 2320-5962.
Article DOI : 10.5958/2320-5962.2019.00009.3

Effectiveness of Articaine, Single Buccal Infiltration Versus Lidocaine, Conventional Buccal and Palatal Infiltration in Maxillary Local Anesthesia: A Comparative Clinical Study

Choudhary Shivendra1, Shankar Daya2,*, Das Vonita3, Vuthoo Kunal4, Vuthoo Vishal5

1Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry, Patna Medical College & Hospital, Patna, Bihar (India), Chief Coordinator-Indian Forum of Dental Skills (Bihar Chapter)

2Senior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Patna Medical College & Hospital, Patna, Bihar (India)

3Chief Program Coordinator, Narain Sewa Sansthan, Assam State Branch,

42nd yr. Post Graduate, Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology& Microbiology, DDCRC, Kota (Raj),

52nd yr. P.G, Dept. of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Daswani Dental College & Research Center, Kota (Rajasthan)

*Corresponding Author: Daya Shankar, Senior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Patna Medical College & Hospital, Patna, Bihar (India)

Online published on 6 April, 2019.

Abstract

Local anesthetic agents are used in dentistry for various painless procedures including surgeries for bone and soft tissue. Despite the advent of modern injection techniques, palatal injection continues to be a painful experience for maxillary anesthesia. Among local anesthetics, articaine has been recommended for providing an improved anesthetic effect on palatal surface with single buccal infiltration in the patients presenting for dental treatments in maxillary arch. The aim of this clinical study is to compare the effectiveness of 4% articaine with 1: 200000 adrenaline single buccal infiltration versus2% lidocaine with 1: 200000 adrenalineconventional buccal and palatal infiltration in maxillary arch for securing arch bars and extractions for orthodontic treatment. The result of this comparative clinical study based on visual analogue scale and comfort score of patients concluded thatarticaine local anesthetic administration via buccal infiltration only obviates the need for the painful palatal block with conventional local anesthetic lidocaine in maxillary arch.

Top

Keywords

Articaine Hydrochloride, Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Maxillary Buccal Infiltration.

Top

  
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
393,835,744 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.